Identity Threat Detection and Response
Kill stolen credentials before they are used
Shuts off stolen passwords and keys within minutes, not weeks.
For CISO, IAM leader
What changes
Stop breach-notification lag. Start seeing it live.
Shortens the window between a credential being exposed and it becoming useless to an attacker. SecSemantic computes who can really act on what, across human, machine and service identities, detects exposed credentials, and revokes them through the customer's identity provider under a pre-approved playbook. It also closes the privilege chains that lead from ordinary accounts to critical assets.
Before · reports you wait for
- breach-notification lagreport
- periodic access reviewsreport
After · live on SecSemantic
- MTTK Mean Time to Kill a stolen credentialHow fast a stolen credential stops working0.4hours↓
- IPC Identity Path ClosurePrivilege paths to crown jewels that got closed88%↑
How it works
SecSemantic is a business-aware security context plane that runs inside the customer's own cloud account. It joins cloud, identity, security-tool and business-calendar data into one graph, simulates attacks on a digital twin, and turns exposures into dated fix-by plans before the business windows they threaten. AI proposes; deterministic engines decide; every action is approved and audited.
We map your estate
Your cloud, identities, security tools and business calendar go into one live graph. It runs in your own cloud account.
We attack a copy of it
A digital twin shows every path an attacker could take to the things that matter most.
We hunt for it, in your terms
Each simulated path is hunted in your own telemetry and mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, tactic by tactic.
We rank by what it would cost you
Each exposure gets a fix-by date, tied to the business moment it puts at risk.
You approve. We prove it.
A person approves every change. After the fix, we re-run the attack to show the path is gone.
What we are measured on
One headline number. One that backs it up.
How fast a stolen credential stops working
From a credential being found exposed to its revocation taking effect
0.4hours
your baseline · 96 hours100% lower in 90 days
Commitment · Down against diagnostic baselineEvidence · Audit trail
-
IPCIdentity Path ClosureSupporting
Privilege paths to crown jewels that got closed
Share of identity privilege paths to crown-jewel assets found at baseline that are closed by the end of the period
88%↑ vs baseline
Replaces periodic access-review sign-offsEvidence · Twin history
Numbers shown are illustrative. Yours start from your own baseline, measured in the diagnostic.
Proof you can open
Every number comes from a record you own.
Here that record is the audit trail. If we cannot show where a number came from, we do not report it.
- day 1 · 09:04idpcredential svc-billing-key found exposed · public repository
- day 2 · 11:21twineffective access: s3://hl-cardholder via role-billing-admin
- day 4 · 13:38playbookpre-approved revoke · identity provider call issued
- day 5 · 15:55auditrevocation in effect · 00:23 after detection
- day 7 · 17:12twinprivilege chain acct-ops-14 → role-admin closed
Questions
What people ask before they start.
Can you promise a stolen credential is revoked before it is used?
No, and nobody honestly can. We commit to MTTK, the time from a credential's exposure to its revocation, against your own baseline. Revocation includes a human approval, and the pod works with you to make that step fast for the identities that matter most.
Do you change permissions or revoke credentials on your own?
No. Every removal and revocation runs through a human approval, with the impact attached.
How do you avoid removing access that is in use?
Removal recommendations come from observed use in your cloud audit logs, and each carries its impact. Where activity has not been observed, the recommendation says UNKNOWN rather than "unused".
Do your measurements act on our identities?
No. Accuracy is measured with probes in a dedicated test account and against the cloud provider's policy simulator. Nothing is attempted with your identities.
How is this different from reading entitlements?
Entitlement tools list what is attached to an identity. This computes what the identity can do once every policy scope, condition and role chain has had its vote, and measures that answer against reality.
Which identities does it cover?
Human and machine identities in AWS, Azure and GCP, including the roles they can assume.
See Identity Threat Detection and Response on your own estate.
A 30-minute walkthrough with an engineer. We show the MTTK loop running and answer what it would look like for you.
Every solution is sold against one headline KPI, committed for 90 days against your own baseline and reported from evidence you can inspect.
vikat.AI · your guide
Ask Yati
Which solution fits your estate, what the 30-day diagnostic measures, how a pod works inside your team: ask in your own words.