Continuous Exposure Management
Find and close every path to your crown jewels
Finds every way an attacker could reach your most important data, and closes it.
For CISO, vulnerability and cloud security leads
What changes
Stop the annual penetration test. Start seeing it live.
Finds every exploitable path to the customer's crown jewels as soon as a change opens it, ranks it by consequence to the business on the date that matters, and closes it before the relevant business window. Internet-facing entry points are traced hop by hop to the workloads that serve them, and cloud posture findings are ranked by business impact rather than counted. After each fix, the path is re-simulated to prove it collapsed.
Before · reports you wait for
- the annual penetration testreport
- patch SLA ageing reportsreport
- asset spreadsheetsreport
- raw posture-finding countsreport
After · live on SecSemantic
- MTTP Mean Time to Prevent exploitationHow fast a reachable weakness gets closed6days↓
- MTTD Mean Time to Discover an exposureHow fast a new exposure shows up on the twin4hours↓
- CCF Critical Cloud FindingsCloud findings that really matter, ranked by impact9open↓
How it works
SecSemantic is a business-aware security context plane that runs inside the customer's own cloud account. It joins cloud, identity, security-tool and business-calendar data into one graph, simulates attacks on a digital twin, and turns exposures into dated fix-by plans before the business windows they threaten. AI proposes; deterministic engines decide; every action is approved and audited.
We map your estate
Your cloud, identities, security tools and business calendar go into one live graph. It runs in your own cloud account.
We attack a copy of it
A digital twin shows every path an attacker could take to the things that matter most.
We hunt for it, in your terms
Each simulated path is hunted in your own telemetry and mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, tactic by tactic.
We rank by what it would cost you
Each exposure gets a fix-by date, tied to the business moment it puts at risk.
You approve. We prove it.
A person approves every change. After the fix, we re-run the attack to show the path is gone.
What we are measured on
One headline number. Three that back it up.
How fast a reachable weakness gets closed
From an exploited vulnerability being found reachable to its closure by patch or compensating change
6days
your baseline · 41 days85% lower in 90 days
Commitment · Down against baseline; exploited and reachable closed firstEvidence · Twin history
-
MTTDMean Time to Discover an exposureSupporting
How fast a new exposure shows up on the twin
From the change that opened a path to a crown jewel, as recorded in cloud audit logs, to that path appearing on the twin with its evidence
4hours↓ vs baseline
Replaces exposure found once a year by the pentestEvidence · Twin history
-
CCFCritical Cloud FindingsSupporting
Cloud findings that really matter, ranked by impact
Open posture findings ranked critical by consequence to the business
9open↓ vs baseline
Replaces raw posture-finding countsEvidence · Twin
-
ESCExternal Surface CoverageSupporting
How much of your internet-facing surface is traced
Share of internet-facing entry points traced, hop by hop, to the workload that serves them
97%↑ vs baseline
Replaces asset spreadsheets, point-in-time external scansEvidence · Twin
Numbers shown are illustrative. Yours start from your own baseline, measured in the diagnostic.
Proof you can open
Every number comes from a record you own.
Here that record is the twin history. If we cannot show where a number came from, we do not report it.
- day 1 · 09:04twinpath hl-edge-alb → svc-payments → s3://hl-cardholder opened by change c-4812
- day 2 · 11:21twinranked critical · consequence: cardholder data · window: settlement run 03 Oct
- day 4 · 13:38planfix-by 01 Oct · owner platform-eng · compensating change proposed
- day 5 · 15:55twinre-simulated after patch · path collapsed · closure proven
- day 7 · 17:12twinMTTP sample recorded · 2d 14h
Questions
What people ask before they start.
Do you run attacks against our environment?
No. Paths are computed on the twin from read-only evidence. Nothing is probed, exploited or scanned in production, which is also why a fix can be tested without a change window.
How is this different from our vulnerability scanner or posture tool?
Those tools find individual issues, and they stay. Their findings are evidence the twin reads. Attack Path Closure connects them to identities, network rules and business context to show which of them form a route to something that matters.
How do you know a path is real?
Every hop names the evidence behind it: the security group rule, the role policy statement, the observed traffic. The accuracy of path verdicts is published in your console as stated against held. Where it has not been measured, the record says UNMEASURED.
What about parts of the estate you cannot see?
They are reported as UNKNOWN and treated as possibly open. A path through an unobserved segment is shown with that caveat, never hidden and never assumed safe.
Will the recommended fix break something?
Every recommendation is re-simulated with the change applied and carries an impact preview: what it closes and which dependent services it would affect. If the impact cannot be evaluated, the fix is not presented as safe.
Who makes the change?
Your team, through your change process. Attack Path Closure recommends and proves. It does not change your estate. With Governed Containment, approved changes can be executed with a human approval on every action.
How do you rank paths?
By what they reach in your business, using SVSS, the contextual score. Every score breaks down into named contributions you can trace to evidence. A vulnerability exploited in the wild, reachable and next to a crown jewel always ranks in the top band. Nothing is ranked by raw finding count.
Which clouds does it cover?
AWS, Azure and GCP.
How soon do we see paths?
The coverage report arrives within 30 minutes of connecting a cloud. Reachable paths to crown jewels follow in week one, and the change that collapses most of them in week two.
See Continuous Exposure Management on your own estate.
A 30-minute walkthrough with an engineer. We show the MTTP loop running and answer what it would look like for you.
Every solution is sold against one headline KPI, committed for 90 days against your own baseline and reported from evidence you can inspect.
vikat.AI · your guide
Ask Yati
Which solution fits your estate, what the 30-day diagnostic measures, how a pod works inside your team: ask in your own words.