Threat Detection and Response
Every alert to a verdict, real threats contained
Checks every security alert and stops real threats with the tools you already have.
For SOC manager, CISO
What changes
Stop raw alert counts. Start seeing it live.
Takes every alert to an evidenced verdict and contains real threats through the customer's own controls. Detection puts each event in business context; investigation reaches a deterministic verdict using typed tools; containment either pushes a signed blocking rule to existing enforcement points or executes an approved, verified action. No alert is dropped and no infrastructure change happens without human approval.
Before · reports you wait for
- raw alert countsreport
- dwell-time averagesreport
- analyst-by-analyst triagereport
After · live on SecSemantic
- MTTC Mean Time to ContainHow fast a real threat is contained1.5hours↓
- MTTV Mean Time to VerdictHow fast every alert gets a clear verdict9min↓
How it works
SecSemantic is a business-aware security context plane that runs inside the customer's own cloud account. It joins cloud, identity, security-tool and business-calendar data into one graph, simulates attacks on a digital twin, and turns exposures into dated fix-by plans before the business windows they threaten. AI proposes; deterministic engines decide; every action is approved and audited.
We map your estate
Your cloud, identities, security tools and business calendar go into one live graph. It runs in your own cloud account.
We attack a copy of it
A digital twin shows every path an attacker could take to the things that matter most.
We hunt for it, in your terms
Each simulated path is hunted in your own telemetry and mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, tactic by tactic.
We rank by what it would cost you
Each exposure gets a fix-by date, tied to the business moment it puts at risk.
You approve. We prove it.
A person approves every change. After the fix, we re-run the attack to show the path is gone.
What we are measured on
One headline number. One that backs it up.
How fast a real threat is contained
From the first alert of an event to containment in effect: a blocking rule enforcing, or an approved action executed and verified
1.5hours
your baseline · 38 hours96% lower in 90 days
Commitment · Down against baseline; a human approval on every changeEvidence · Audit trail
-
MTTVMean Time to VerdictSupporting
How fast every alert gets a clear verdict
From the first alert of an event to an evidenced verdict
9min↓ vs baseline
Replaces raw alert countsEvidence · Twin history
Numbers shown are illustrative. Yours start from your own baseline, measured in the diagnostic.
Proof you can open
Every number comes from a record you own.
Here that record is the audit trail. If we cannot show where a number came from, we do not report it.
- day 1 · 09:04detectevent e-7731 · anomalous token use · context: finance close week
- day 2 · 11:21investigatetyped tools: session graph, geo, device posture · verdict: malicious
- day 4 · 13:38containsigned blocking rule pushed to edge enforcement point
- day 5 · 15:55approvehuman approval recorded · j.okafor · action verified
- day 7 · 17:12auditMTTC sample recorded · 01:12
Questions
What people ask before they start.
Does this replace our SIEM, EDR or SOAR?
No. They stay. Their alerts and telemetry are evidence the twin reads and connects.
Do we need to install agents?
No new agents. It reads telemetry your tools already produce, such as endpoint alerts, cloud audit logs, network flow logs and traces.
Does an AI decide whether something is an incident?
No. Deterministic rules decide over the evidence. A model may explain the verdict in plain language, and the whole product works with the model switched off.
Can an attacker manipulate the investigation with text in logs or file names?
No. Attacker-influenced text is treated as data. Poisoned estate text and poisoned threat reports both leave the outcome unchanged, and a test proves it on every build.
Does it take containment actions on its own?
No. It proposes a reversible containment and cannot execute it. With Governed Containment, a proposal can be executed after a person approves it.
What does "pre-investigated" include?
Scope, reach, paths to crown jewels, correlation, retrieved context and a verdict by rules, each step recorded, plus a proposed containment.
Will merging alerts hide anything?
No. Every alert merged into an incident is preserved inside it. None is dropped.
How do detection rules get to production?
Each rule carries an example that should fire and one that should not. It runs in the background first and is promoted to live only on measured precision.
See Threat Detection and Response on your own estate.
A 30-minute walkthrough with an engineer. We show the MTTC loop running and answer what it would look like for you.
Every solution is sold against one headline KPI, committed for 90 days against your own baseline and reported from evidence you can inspect.
vikat.AI · your guide
Ask Yati
Which solution fits your estate, what the 30-day diagnostic measures, how a pod works inside your team: ask in your own words.