Solutions · CyberSec · Preempt
Know if today's threat reaches you.
Emerging Threat Exposure matches new vulnerabilities, exploitation listings and threat intelligence against a twin of your estate, and returns a verdict in your context: is it present, is it reachable, and what would it reach. Without a single lookup leaving your network.
Exploitable exposure closed sooner when a new threat lands.
- Reachable exploited vulnerabilities closed sooner. Measured by MTTP, Mean Time to Prevent exploitation.
- A verdict for your estate sooner after a threat is listed. Measured by time to exposure verdict.
- Fewer exploited vulnerabilities on paths to your crown jewels. Measured by reachable exploited vulnerabilities on crown-jewel paths.
Supporting KPIs
Time to exposure verdict ↓
From an exploitation listing to an evidenced verdict for your estate
twin history
Reachable exploited vulnerabilities on crown-jewel paths ↓
Exploited, present, reachable and on a path to a crown jewel
twin
Exploited-vulnerability exposure window ↓
From a "reachable" verdict to closure by patch or compensating change
twin history
Intelligence freshness ↓
Age of the bundle behind current verdicts, against its budget
twin
Baselines are set in the 30-day diagnostic. Targets are committed in the 90-day scorecard. A KPI we cannot measure is reported as UNMEASURED.
"Are we exposed?" should not take a week.
A new critical vulnerability sets off the same scramble every time. Find where the software runs. Decide whether anyone can reach it. Guess what it would lead to. Then argue about what to patch first.
Read why
The severity score is the same for every company in the world. Whether the vulnerable system faces the internet, holds deploy credentials or sits one hop from payment data is true only of yours.
And most threat intelligence is consumed by sending your indicators to someone else's service. The pattern of what you look up is a map of what you are worried about.
What it costs
- Emergency patching of systems that reach nothing that matters.
- Real exposure on a system with a moderate score, left waiting.
- Intelligence that ages quietly and keeps reporting "clean".
One listing, read in one estate.
CVE-2024-23897 · exploitation observed in the wild · CISA KEV listed- present: jenkins-01
- reachable: yes ·
sg-0f3a41 · ingress tcp/8080 · src 0.0.0.0/0· observed · as of 51 min - reaches: s3://hl-cardholder, through path P-0198, 4 hops
- verdict: top band · exploited, reachable and next to a crown jewel
illustrative console output · the categories and the final line are the contract
A verdict in your context, not a score in everyone's.
Emerging Threat Exposure runs on SecSemantic's twin, with a threat intelligence corpus that lives inside the appliance.
For each new vulnerability: where it is present, whether an attacker can reach it, and what compromising it would yield, hop by hop.
A vulnerability listed as exploited in the wild, reachable and close to a crown jewel is always in the top band. Everything else is ranked by what it reaches in your business.
The corpus lives in the appliance and refreshes nightly as a signed bundle. Matching happens locally. Not one indicator lookup leaves your network.
Every new bundle triggers a re-scan of retained history, so an indicator published today is checked against what already happened.
When intelligence ages past its budget, verdicts are downgraded and eventually return UNKNOWN. Never "no threat found".
Poisoned or attacker-written intelligence cannot change a verdict, a severity band or a recommendation. A test on every build proves it.
What you get
- A per-threat exposure verdict: present, reachable, what it reaches, and the evidence
- A patch order ranked by consequence, with a compensating change where a patch cannot ship yet
- A retrospective check of retained history for each new bundle
- The age of the intelligence behind every verdict
Industry lens
Exposure verdicts for payment and trading systems first.
Clinical and patient-data systems first.
Intelligence carried in by hand to an air-gapped appliance, with an identical result.
What it is not
Not a threat-intelligence feed. Nothing of yours leaves the appliance, so nothing of yours can become one.
FAQ
Do you send our indicators or asset list to a threat-intelligence service?
No. The corpus is inside the appliance and matching is local. Not one lookup leaves your network.
Where does the intelligence come from?
Public vulnerability and exploitation data, including CVE records, EPSS probabilities, the CISA KEV catalogue and the ATT&CK technique catalogue, in every engagement. Commercial intelligence where your engagement includes it.
Can we check the intelligence?
The public tier is readable on purpose. You can verify our CVE and KEV data against the public sources yourself.
Do you find vulnerabilities?
Your scanners find them, and they stay. Emerging Threat Exposure decides which of them matter in your estate, with evidence.
How quickly does a new listing become a verdict?
The corpus refreshes nightly. Verdicts are computed on the twin as soon as a bundle installs. The time from listing to verdict is one of the KPIs we measure with you.
What if our appliance is air-gapped?
The same signed bundles can be carried in by hand. The result is identical to a connected install.
What happens if the intelligence goes stale?
Verdicts are downgraded as it ages and eventually return UNKNOWN. Stale intelligence is never reported as "clean".
What if we cannot patch straight away?
Where a patch cannot ship, the verdict proposes a compensating change, such as closing the exposure on the path, and shows what it closes and what it would affect.
How Emerging Threat Exposure is delivered
A capability, the people who run it with you, and numbers you can check.
-
Diagnostic · days 0 to 30, at no cost.
The twin is launched, the first intelligence bundle installs, and the coverage report arrives within 30 minutes. Every vulnerability already present is checked for reachability and consequence, and every KPI baseline is measured.
-
The 90-day KPI scorecard is agreed: MTTP and the supporting KPIs, each committed against your baseline.
-
Outcome · days 30 to 90.
Each new exploitation listing becomes a verdict for your estate, with a patch order and compensating changes that your pod works to closure with your teams.
-
The scorecard is reported with its evidence and who measured it. The outcome bonus is paid only against it.
-
The Semantic Loop · from day 90.
Every new bundle re-scans retained history, and every patch and exception is fed back into the twin.
The pod
two senior engineers and a fractional CISO advisor
-
Forward-deployed security engineer.
Deploys the twin and the intelligence plane, runs the context sessions, owns the KPI baseline with you.
-
Exposure analyst.
Turns each verdict into a patch or compensation plan and tracks it to closure.
-
Fractional CISO advisor.
Owns the 90-day scorecard with your leadership and chairs the day-90 review.
What runs underneath
SecSemantic's threat intelligence plane inside the appliance, with Sentinel's findings and coverage, network reachability, blast radius and SVSS, and Shield's local matching. Insights presents verdicts, read-only.
Read the next listing in your own estate.
We connect read-only, install the intelligence locally, and show which of the vulnerabilities you already carry reach anything that matters.