Solutions · CyberSec · Preempt Early access
Close the flaw before the code ships.
AppSec and Supply Chain finds weaknesses in your code and in the software you depend on, ranks them by what the service that runs them can reach, and lands the fix as a pull request your developers merge.
More fixes merged before the code ships.
- More weaknesses fixed before release. Measured by PSC, Pre Ship Closure.
- More remediation pull requests merged. Measured by remediation pull requests merged.
- Fewer critical weaknesses in services on paths to your crown jewels. Measured by critical weaknesses in services on crown-jewel paths.
Supporting KPIs
Bill of materials coverage ↑
Share of repositories with a current software bill of materials
your repositories
Remediation pull requests merged ↑
Share of opened remediation pull requests that merged
your repositories
Critical weaknesses in services on crown-jewel paths ↓
Open critical weaknesses in services that can reach a crown jewel
twin
Age of open critical weaknesses ↓
How long critical weaknesses have been open
your repositories
Baselines are set in the 30-day diagnostic. Targets are committed in the 90-day scorecard. A KPI we cannot measure is reported as UNMEASURED.
A backlog is not a security programme.
Code scanners and dependency checkers report every weakness they find, and the backlog becomes the measure: how many are open, how old they are, how many were triaged.
Read why
Most of them sit in code that never reaches anything important, while a moderate weakness in a service that holds production credentials waits its turn.
And the software you depend on is the least visible part of what you ship. Without a bill of materials, "are we affected?" is a search, not an answer.
What it costs
- Developer time spent on weaknesses in code that reaches nothing that matters.
- Fixes reported to developers and never merged.
- A supply-chain question that takes days to answer.
One weakness, ranked by what runs it.
- weakness in a library used by the deploy service on jenkins-01
- the running service holds role/hl-ci-deploy · reaches s3://hl-cardholder through P-0198 · ranked first
- remediation pull request opened · tests pass · awaiting review
- merged · closed before the next release
illustrative console output · the categories and the final line are the contract
Weaknesses ranked by the running service, fixed where the code lives.
AppSec and Supply Chain connects your repositories to SecSemantic's twin, so every weakness is ranked by what the service that runs it can reach in production.
Source code, application posture and third-party dependencies are analysed across your repositories.
A software bill of materials is generated and kept current, so "are we affected?" is a lookup.
Each repository is linked to the services it deploys on the twin. A weakness in a service that can reach a crown jewel outranks the same weakness in one that reaches nothing.
Your pod lands remediation pull requests with your developers, in their repositories and their review process.
Success is the fix merged before the code ships, not the finding reported.
What you get
- Weakness findings across code and dependencies, ranked by the running service's reach
- A software bill of materials for every repository
- Remediation pull requests landed with your developers
- A pre-ship closure record: which fixes merged before release
Industry lens
Weaknesses in payment services first, with merge evidence for change control.
Services handling patient data first.
A bill of materials ready when your own customers ask for one.
What it is not
Not a report generator. Fixes are measured by whether they merged.
FAQ
Do you merge pull requests?
No. Your pod opens remediation pull requests; your developers review and merge them.
How is a weakness linked to what it can reach?
Each repository is linked to the services it deploys, and each service to its workload on the twin, so the ranking follows the path from the code to what the running service can reach.
How AppSec and Supply Chain is delivered
A capability, the pod that runs it with you, and a scorecard you hold us to.
-
Diagnostic · days 0 to 30, at no cost.
The twin is launched and your repositories connected. Weaknesses are ranked by what the running service can reach, bill-of-materials coverage is measured, and every KPI baseline is set.
-
The 90-day KPI scorecard is agreed: PSC and the supporting KPIs, each committed against your baseline.
-
Outcome · days 30 to 90.
Your pod lands remediation pull requests with your developers, starting with the services on crown-jewel paths.
-
The scorecard is reported with its evidence and who measured it. The outcome bonus is paid only against it.
-
The Semantic Loop · from day 90.
Every merge, exception and release is fed back into the twin, so rankings follow what actually runs.
The pod
two senior engineers and a fractional CISO advisor
-
Forward-deployed security engineer.
Deploys the twin, connects your repositories, and owns the KPI baseline with you.
-
Application security engineer.
Lands remediation pull requests with your developers and keeps the bill of materials current.
-
Fractional CISO advisor.
Owns the 90-day scorecard with your leadership and chairs the day-90 review.
What runs underneath
Shield Soter for code, dependency and bill-of-materials analysis, on Sentinel's twin: business context, network reachability and attack paths for ranking. Insights presents the findings and the closure record, read-only.
Merge the fix that matters first.
In the diagnostic we rank your code weaknesses by what the running service can reach, and show which fixes would close the most before your next release.